The Philadelphia Church

Philadelphia is obviously a special church. There are only two churches of the seven that receive no condemnation from Jesus, and Philadelphia is one of them.  Being the sixth church, this special church must come into existence sometime after the Protestant Reformation Churches lose momentum and before the appearance of the last church.

God’s kingdom is not a static entity that stalls and falters. God’s kingdom is like a plant that continues to grow until it reaches maturity (see Mk. 4:26-29). If the branches that appear on the plant do not produce the right fruit they are cut off and replaced with those that will (see Jn. 15:1-6).  Sometimes even more radical pruning is required and the whole trunk is cut down and others are grafted into the stump (see Matt. 1:7-10; Rom. 11:15-21). Therefore, God’s rejection of the Reformation Churches is consistent with His dealings in the past.

To carry on where the fifth church has flattered and fallen, God therefore, calls the sixth church to take up the torch and carry the kingdom forward. There is only one church that this can apply to.  Historically there is only one church that comes out of the Reformation Churches and carries on the work that they courageously began.  That church is the Advent movement – and the beginning of the Philadelphia era, heralds the rise of the Advent movement – the Advent movement is the Philadelphia Church.

If this assertion is disputed, then one has to identify another movement that is carrying on the work of the Reformation in the world today. Furthermore, if another religious movement is identified as being the Philadelphia church, then that religious movement’s experience would have to fit the description given in the contents of the Philadelphia church in Revelation. However, the facts are:  that the description given of the Philadelphia church in Revelation describes accurately, the experience of the Advent movement and none other.  To begin with, the sixth church must incorporate the use of the ‘key of David’ in its experience.

The Advent Movement and the Key of David

In His message to the Philadelphia Church, Jesus says, that He has, been given the key of David. What does Jesus do with this key? Jesus replies that it is He: “that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth” (Rev. 3:7). This authority over doors that open and shut is repeated again in the next verse, “behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it” (Rev. 3:8).  Such an obvious repetition implies importance, and compels investigation.

It is evident that “the key of David” is what gives Christ the authority to open and shut doors. So, what is this “key of David?”  Because we know that the book of Revelation is largely a mosaic of images and illustrations taken from the Old Testament, we should expect to find a type for which the ‘key of David’ in Revelation is the antitype.  We find it in Isaiah – Jesus is quoting from Isa. 22:22.

The context in Isaiah concerns the unfaithfulness of the king’s servant Shebna. Shebna’s official position is described as being “over the house” (Isa. 22:15). This position of “over the house” is described elsewhere, as including the office of regent (see 2 Kings 15:5). It is therefore a high position and in the case of Shebna, included the office of treasurer.

However, Shebna is more concerned about self-aggrandizement, than the welfare of the nation and Isaiah prophesizes that the Lord will replace him with faithful Eliakim. Isaiah continues to prophesy about Eliakim’s faithfulness, his duties and the effect he will have upon the nation:

This assertion, that Jesus is in charge of the heavenly tabernacle (the government), is further reinforced when we take note of the fact, that the key of David is “laid upon his shoulder.” This reference to “his shoulder” should alert us to a similar statement in Isaiah:

The key of David is placed upon the shoulder of Christ and the government is placed upon the shoulder of Christ – they are the same thing. This is why Jesus went to Heaven after His resurrection, and then returned saying to His disciples: “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth” (Matt: 28:18) – the key of David and the government had been placed upon His shoulder.

Therefore, the reason why the key of David is mentioned, in this particular context should now be obvious – as the ‘Key Holder,’ Jesus is about to open a door in heaven and close another one – and the opening and closure of these doors, must take place during the historical period of the Philadelphia Church.

Eliakim’s name means, ‘God is setting up’ and he is a type of Christ. Because of his faithfulness he is appointed to the position of having control over the king’s house. This is the position that Jesus occupies in heaven. Because of His faithfulness, Jesus occupies the same position in heaven that faithful Eliakim occupied on earth. Just as Eliakim was ‘set up’ or in charge of the earthly king’s house on earth – Christ has been ‘set up’ or put in charge of the heavenly King’s ‘house’ in heaven.

The Philadelphia Church follows Christ into the Most Holy Place

Jesus says to the Philadelphia Church, “I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it” (Rev. 3:8). To understand what these doors are, once again, we need to observe the rules of interpretation and try to locate the opening and shutting of doors in the Old Testament. We find these doors in the sanctuary – the sanctuary that was made according to a pattern (see Ex. 25:8, 9). Which Adventists have always understood to be an earthly representation of the sanctuary in Heaven.

Once a year the ‘door’ into the most holy place was opened, and the high priest went in to make atonement for the people’s sins, that had accumulated over the year. It was a time of judgment, and if the people had faithfully confessed their sins, they were considered ‘clean,’ and they were able to participate in the next festival, the festival of tabernacles, which is symbolic of entering into heaven.

Thus, the opening of this door is a necessary and vital step in the process of salvation. Therefore, it was necessary for God’s people on earth, to be informed about this event. Knowledge of this event is necessary and vital because the event heralds changes that were taking place in God’s kingdom, and God’s people have to adjust and change with them. Therefore, it was necessary to call and establish a new church at this time. The fifth church, having lost its vitality and direction is incapable of performing God’s will at this time.  Therefore, it is given to the sixth church to inform the world that the door into the most holy place has been opened, with everything that this implies.

The opening of the door into the most holy place, on earth, is therefore a type, which was fulfilled in heaven on October 22, 1844 (see Appendix 2). It was at this time that both the Father and the Son rose up from the throne in the holy place and entered into the most holy place. It was at this time that the antitypical judgment began, as symbolized by the type on earth.

Ellen White clearly places the transition, from the holy place to the most holy place, in 1844.  She also clearly indicates, that this transition ushers in, the era of the Philadelphia Church.  This connection between 1844 and the Philadelphia Church and the transition, from the holy place, to the most holy place, is brought forward, when Ellen White recounts the events, that occurred in the aftermath of the ‘great disappointment.’  She tells us, that the Advent believers, found the solution to their disappointment, in the message to the Philadelphia Church:

Ellen White states, that the words concerning the opening and closing of doors in heaven, found in the message to the Philadelphia Church are “addressed to the church at this very time.”  Elsewhere she clearly explains, that the opening and the shutting of the doors in heaven, took place in 1844, and again she places these events within the context of the Philadelphia Church, by quoting from the message to the Philadelphia Church:

There can be no doubt that Ellen White places the events recorded in the message to the Philadelphia Church in 1844.  Therefore, it can be concluded that Ellen White teaches that the Philadelphia Church is the spiritual representation of the Advent movement, just as Thyatira is the spiritual representation of the Roman Catholic Church, and Sardis the spiritual representation of the Protestant Churches. This conclusion, as radical as it may seem, will be proven again and again as we discover this truth repeated and enlarged upon as we continue in the book of Revelation.

The Philadelphia Church and the SDA Pioneers

Most Seventh-day Adventists are ignorant of the fact, that the founders of their church [including Ellen White], believed that they were the Philadelphia Church. Those who cannot ‘see’ or ‘hear’ this most important Truth will never understand the Book of Revelation, and if they already belong to the Advent movement, they will never understand the role and purpose, of what they belong to.

The reason why many Adventists refuse to see and hear, on this issue is because, they have never been presented with all the evidence.  They have never heard it preached and never seen it taught. The prophet truly said, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” (Hos. 4:6). Ellen White said there would be a revival among God’s people if we were to understand the Book of Revelation.  We need to patiently and prayerfully examine the evidence. We need to heed the counsel of Solomon, “He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him” (Prov. 18:13). If we do finally accept the fact that the Philadelphia Church is the same as the Advent movement, we may be able to see and understand the enormous privilege [and responsibility] it is to be a member of the Advent movement – and if we do not manage to see a revival in the Adventist Church, we may at least be refreshed in our own spiritual lives.

The Advent movement preached the imminent second coming of Christ, and eventually settled on the date of 22 October 1844.  This day has been recorded in history as the ‘great disappointment.’  When the Adventists went through this experience in 1844, those who survived, with their faith intact, searched their Bibles, to find answers to their questions and to discover their mistake. They found the solution in the sanctuary service. They saw that Jesus had taken the role of High Priest in heaven as typified by the day of atonement on earth. As they studied the Scriptures, they recognized that the Philadelphian experience, described by Jesus, was exactly the experience that they had lived through, and they understood that the Philadelphia Church applied to them. We have already seen that Ellen White understood that the Philadelphian message applied to the Advent movement.  Others who lived through that time and later became founders and pioneers of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, shared the same opinion. James White wrote: “…the Philadelphia Church is the true church of the last days…”  (RH May 9, 1854).  He also wrote that it was God who, reached forth His hand at this time, to establish the Philadelphia Church:

Joseph Bates wrote:

W.S. Ingraham wrote:

The spiritual forefathers of the Advent movement were well justified in claiming membership in the Philadelphia Church.  They were well-versed Bible scholars and they understood that they were at the forefront of unfolding ‘present truth.’ They saw the harmony between the Old Testament sanctuary service and the ministry and movement of Christ in heaven. They understood that the sanctuary service and the festivals associated with it, were a prophecy about Christ, and that these prophecies were being fulfilled in their day.

We need to travel the same road that our spiritual forefathers took.  So that we too, can be equally convinced, that the message to the Philadelphia Church, does in fact herald the beginning of and represents the experience of the Advent movement.  We will only be ‘spiritually anchored’ – as Adventists when we recognize that the Advent movement has been a movement led by God.  And the greatest evidence for those of us, who live in the 21^st century, is the fact that this movement appears so clearly ‘prophetically presented’ in the Book of Revelation – for those who have ‘ears to hear.’

You Have Not Denied My Name

It has been estimated, that at its height, the Advent movement [prior to the great disappointment], in America alone, had a minimum of 50,000 believers. After the ‘great disappointment’ it has been estimated, that in the year 1846, there were no more than 50 believers, that coalesced into the group, that were seeking answers based on a new understanding of the sanctuary service [see Early Writings, the Historical Prologue, p. xvii].This group of believers, refused to accept, that God had not genuinely led in the experience they had just been through. Meanwhile the majority formed another association of advent believers numbering approximately 30,000 members. The remainder either gave up their advent hopes, went back to their original churches, or gave up their faith in Christianity completely. This is why Jesus says of this little group of 50 believers:

Out of the 50,000 who accepted the Advent message, only very small groups were searching the Scriptures for answers, therefore Jesus says, “for thou hast a little strength.”  They have not given up believing in the Bible, they have faith that the answers can be found there, therefore Jesus says, “you have kept my word”. And they certainly have not given up trusting in Christ, therefore Jesus says, “and hast not denied my name” – as many other participants in the Advent movement had done.

The Philadelphia Church goes through the Time of Trouble

The ‘hour of temptation’ is the ‘time of trouble’ (see below). This time of trouble, which comes upon all those who live on the earth, is clearly future. It is clearly future, because it comes upon all those who live on the earth. Such a worldwide time of trouble has not happened yet. When it does come, it will be the last trial that God’s people have to endure before the second coming of Christ. Therefore, the Philadelphia Church must come into existence sometime after the Protestant Churches, and continues on into the future, right up to the second coming of Christ and the end of the world. The promise to the Philadelphia Church is that Christ will protect and sustain it through this time of trouble. Jeremiah foretold this “hour of temptation.”  He called it ‘Jacob’s trouble’ (see Jer. 30:5-7).

Jacob was on his way home, after being a “stranger in a strange land”.  But before he could arrive safely home, he had to go through a night of terror and anguish. This experience of Jacob’s is a type of the experience that God’s people will go through, in the last days. Just as Jacob had to suffer a time of trouble before he was safely home, so too, do God’s people have to go through a time of trouble before they are safely ‘home’.

Ellen White clearly confirms, that the ‘hour of temptation’ is the same as ‘Jacob’s trouble’ and that this experience belongs to the Philadelphia Church. The following are two excerpts taken from the Great Controversy, chapter 39, ‘The Time of Trouble.’ The context is the issuing of the death decree against those who honor and keep the seventh-day Sabbath:

This promise of Christ’s protection was given to the Philadelphian Church – Ellen White says the promise applies to God’s protection during the time of trouble – therefore it must be the Philadelphian Church that goes through the time of trouble.

The Philadelphia Church are Commandment Keepers

If the death decree is issued, against those who are honoring and keeping the seventh-day Sabbath, it should not be a surprise, to discover that the Philadelphia Church, is described as a commandment keeping church. But God’s promises are always conditional (see Hermeneutics – Biblical Principles of Interpretation). Jesus said:

The Philadelphia Church is not called ‘the church of brotherly love’ without reason. It is precisely because they are keeping the law of God, that they are called the church of brotherly love.  This is because ‘love is the fulfillment of the law’ (Rom. 13:8).  This is further proved by the fact that the Philadelphia Church receives no condemnation from Jesus. There is no condemnation because this church practices love.  The grace of God has achieved its full potential in the Philadelphia Church – grace + Law = Love.

The Philadelphia Church enters Heaven

Because the Philadelphia Church, goes through the time of trouble, this must mean, that the Philadelphia Church remains in existence, until the end of time. It is the church that sees the second coming of Christ and passes into eternity – the Philadelphia Church does not have a use by date. It is the Philadelphia Church, that has all the insignia written on it, that entitles it for entry into heaven.

Ellen White indicates, that it is indeed the Philadelphia Church, that stands triumphantly at the end of time. Commenting on the intensity of Satan’s deceptions just before the time of trouble, she quotes twice from the message to the Philadelphia Church:

“The hour of temptation” and “Because thou hast kept the word of My patience” – are both quotations from the description of the Philadelphia Church. Therefore, Ellen White is referencing the Philadelphia Church, as being the church, that is about to enter the time of trouble. And if the Philadelphia Church, is indeed the church, that is delivered at the second coming of Christ, then it follows, that the Philadelphia Church and the 144,000 must be one and the same.

The Philadelphia Church and the 144,000

When we understand and appreciate, how extensively the principle of repeat and enlarge, is employed in prophecy, it is not difficult to recognize that the Philadelphia Church and the 144,000 are the same people. Or to put it more accurately, the 144,000 are the last generation of the Philadelphia Church – the church that witnesses and takes part in the second coming of Christ. Jesus said to the Philadelphians:

Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. Rev. 3:12.

Once we recognize the working of the repeat and enlarge principle, it is relatively easy to see that the description of the 144,000 is a repetion and enlargement of verse Rev. 3:12. Therefore the Philadelphia Church and the 144, 000 are the same. [Note: this connection will be dealt with in greater detail in chapters 9 – 12].

The Philadelphia Church, the Remnant and the 144,000

As we progress further into the prophetic picture as delineated in the Book of Revelation, it becomes very obvious that the Philadelphia Church is extensively repeated and enlarged upon, throughout the rest of the book. For example, Philadelphia appears again, not just as the 144,000, but also as the Remnant.

We have already noted that the Philadelphia Church is described as a commandment keeping church.  The remnant and the 144,000 are also described as being commandment keepers:

The people of God, in the last days, are also standing on the boundary of the Promised Land and about to enter in. Just like the literal Israelites, these spiritual Israelites must also be tested.  And they are tested over the same issue – whether they will keep the law of God – and the specific law that they are tested on is the same – the seventh day Sabbath. However, this time God’s people do not fail – this is why they are consistently described as commandment keepers.

Just before the Israelites were to enter the Promised Land, God said to Moses, that He was going to prove them: “whether they will walk in my law or no” (Ex. 16:4). The specific commandment that God chose to test them on was the Sabbath. When the candidates for the Promised Land failed the test, God enquired of Moses: “How long refuse you to keep my commandments and my laws” (Ex. 16:28). This experience before entry into the earthly Promised Land is a type, which will be repeated before entry into the heavenly Promised Land.

The Philadelphia Church and The Three Angel’s Messages

Immediately, after the third angel’s message, the people of God are described as:

This verse is structured in the classic Hebrew language manner of repeat and enlarge. “The patience of the saints” is explained and defined by the second half of the verse. In other words, “The patience of the saints” is the same as, “they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” The similarity with “Because thou hast kept the word of my patience” from the message to the Philadelphia Church should be obvious. The “patience of the saints” is simply repeating and enlarging on what has already been introduced as “the word of my patience.” Both of these ‘patiences’ are referring to the same thing – the commandment-keeping people of God.

Once again, we can confirm this conclusion from the writings of Ellen White. She was given a vision to explain the significance of the “open and shut doors” in the message to the Philadelphia Church. The very first thing she is told, is how these ‘doors’ are intimately related to the commandments of God, especially the Sabbath commandment:

Therefore, as we progress through Revelation we will begin to understand that the Philadelphia Church is the Church that preaches the third angel’s message in the last days. All advent historians agree that the Millerite movement preached the first and second angel’s messages – but they did not preach the third angel’s message. Thus, the ‘present truth’ message for the last days was not completed. The Philadelphia Church will finish what the Advent movement began – it is the Philadelphia Church that will finish the work of the three angel’s messages.

Conclusion

When we understand Adventist history, it is not difficult to see, the Advent experience prophesied in the message to the Philadelphian Church – as indeed some of those, who lived through this experience did.  Recognizing this fact, gave great comfort and hope, to the pioneers of the emerging Seventh-day Adventist Church and greatly increased their faith.  Recognizing this same Truth should also anchor and sustain our own faith. And acknowledging this truth is the minimal requirement for a full and accurate understanding of Revelation.

If we recognize and accept, that repeating and enlarging, is the foundational structure of the Book of Revelation, we should also be able to recognize, that the Philadelphia Church, the Remnant and the 144,000 are one and the same. The descriptions of commandment keepers in the Book of Revelation are all describing the same people – the people of God in the last days. They first enter the prophetic picture as the Philadelphia Church, and later they are described as the Remnant and the 144,000.  When these facts are recognized, it should become obvious that the Philadelphia Church, the 144,000 and the Remnant, all perform the same tasks and reap the same rewards.

In the message to the Philadelphia Church we are introduced to the church that was established in 1844, and we are told, that it goes through the time of trouble. Later in Revelation, we will be given additional information about its rise, the message that it will preach, and the opposition that it will arouse, and ultimately, it will be this church that Jesus redeems from the earth at His second coming.