Signs of the Times – part 36
Originally posted April 30, 2014.
Quotes of the Times:
“The idea that we can put a different form of pollution into the atmosphere to cancel out the effects of global warming pollution is utterly insane.” Al Gore, Press Conference in South Africa, Jan. 15, 2014.
”We are already engaged in a planet-wide experiment with consequences.” Al Gore, Ibid.
“Insane, utterly mad and delusional in the extreme.” Al Gore, Ibid.
“If geo-engineering does not stop, nothing else will matter.” Dane Wigington, Lead researcher and administrator, Geo-Engineering Watch.
Geo-engineering is a relatively new term, for an age old process. Mankind has always geo-engineered the landscape/environment, in which he has found himself. For example, the Dutch say, “God created the world, but the Dutch created Holland” – in other words, the Dutch created Holland by geo-engineering the landscape/environment that the found themselves in. Dam building, draining swamps, canals and other such projects have largely been for the betterment of mankind in general.
However, it needs to be recognized that not all projects have been as successful as projected and some have had unforeseen and dire consequences. One example would be the Aswan dam in Egypt. The Aswan dam was a much heralded and hugely anticipated event, for the great benefits it would bestow, on the people of Egypt. Unfortunately, the huge dam interrupted the natural flow, of sediment, to the downstream Nile Delta. The farmers were dependent on this natural process to fertilize their fields – now they have to purchase artificial fertilizer. Therefore, the consequences of the Aswan dam resulted in higher food prices for the whole of Egypt (which also affected Egypt’s ability to export grain at a competitive price – thus increasing the price of grain worldwide).
In the past geo-engineering projects have been limited to nation states (and sometimes their immediate neighbors). Generally, if a geo-engineering project went wrong it would only have a localized impact. However, that has now changed. With the technology that is available to mankind today – we now have the ability to put in place geo-engineering projects that affect the whole planet – and we are doing it.
On March 8 2011, the Royal Society of New Zealand hosted a conference to discuss the scientific, technological and geo-political aspects of geo-engineering schemes and their implications for New Zealand. The purpose of the conference was to examine the options available to combat global warming and climate change. The main issue addressed at the conference was: what can be done to prevent the planet from heating up? Some of the options discussed included; erecting sun shades in space, cloud whitening, stratospheric aerosol spraying, tree planting, ocean fertilization, carbon capture, bio char (using charcoal) and painting roofs white. At the end of the conference, a vote was taken as to which of the schemes discussed would be the most effective at combating climate change. The attendees at the conference included a veritable who’s who of the scientific community in New Zealand and 61% of them voted for stratospheric aerosol spraying. They stated that in order to combat global warming, stratospheric aerosol spraying was the overall cheapest, safest and easiest option to implement. [The Royal Society’s website states that one of its main functions is to ‘advise’ the NZ Government – therefore, if NZ was to make a significant contribution to combatting global warming/climate change its own top scientists have ‘advised’ the NZ Government to spray toxic chemicals/particles into the atmosphere for all New Zealanders to breath].
In addition, the Royal Society conference discussed: what would be the best material to spray in the atmosphere to deflect the rays of the sun? – And they concluded that silver iodine would be the best. A similar conference was held in San Diego, California, in Feb 2010, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and they too concluded that aerosol spraying in the atmosphere was the best option but that the preferred material to be prayed would be aluminum.
Of course ‘atmospheric aerosol spraying’ is popularly known as ‘chemtrails – and conspiracy theorists have been telling us that this is nothing new – this has been going on for many years. “What is the evidence?” you ask. Well, the evidence is now available. Chemtrails have long been a staple item in what is known as the ‘alternative media’ – it is now slowly making its debut on the main stream media and in other arenas (such as the United Nations).
Whistleblowers and others are now coming forward to tell what they know. One such whistleblower is Kristen Meghan, her job in the US military was to ensure that the Air Force was complying with all the environmental regulations and laws implemented by the US Government. She was placed in a position whereby if there was stratospheric aerosol spraying going on, then it was inevitable that she would eventually find it (see below for links). Another woman, Dr. Rosalind Peterson, chairwoman of the Agriculture Defense Coalition, testified before the United Nations about the effects of ‘persistent jet contrails’ (the politically correct term for chemtrails), on agriculture and drinking water. Even Fox News has covered the topic and there is a clip on You Tube showing a commercial jet landing whilst continuing to spray (the pilot forgot to turn the system off). Ordinary citizens in America are organizing themselves to promote awareness – one such initiative started in Atlanta, April 2014, with the erection of billboards along the freeways bearing the message: “Look Up! God No Longer Controls the Weather.” Other citizens in other cities are planning to follow suit.
The sceptics who insist that it is not happening are slowly being overwhelmed. They will soon belong to the same group that insists that governments never lie to us. Even Al Gore (the high priest of man-made global warming) recognizes that chemtrails are a reality – and he is alarmed.
The question is not if it is happening the more important question is: why is it happening? What are they trying to do with all that toxic sludge (eg. barium, aluminum, sulphur strontium, lithium etc.) raining down upon us. The cover story (for those involved) is to combat the terrible danger of climate change (never mind the fact that the climate has always changed). However, the information that we have points us in another direction. The facts indicate that the main purpose is not to modify the weather but to control the weather, in other words, weather warfare.
In the 1940’s and 1950’s and even into the 1960’s modifying and/or controlling the weather was a frequently discussed topic in the main stream media – even the possibility of using the weather as a weapon of war. Then came the Vietnam War and all talk of controlling the weather in the main stream media ceased – it is now common knowledge that America used weather warfare during the Vietnam War. [They tried to create so much rain water over the Ho Chi Minh trail (the supply line from North Vietnam) that the trail would turn into a quagmire].
Weather warfare is an integral part of US military strategy – known as ‘Full Spectrum Dominance’ (the strategy to dominate all technology that can be weaponized. Which of course includes the weather (other nations are actively pursuing the same goals especially the Chinese). [Do you remember the Chinese boasting about how they were going to modify the weather to make it more pleasant for the Beijing Olympic Games?]. Weather control used to be talked about openly (it was even thought in the 1960’s that geo-engineering projects to warm the planet were a good idea). In 1966 NASA published a document entitled: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification.” Twenty years later another document was published entitled: “The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System” – where the authors lamented the fact that the military had taken over the weather modification initiative. Has the military ben successful at controlling the weather? – judge for yourself – a research paper was presented to the US Air Force in 1996 entitled: “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” They cannot possibly know that they are going to ‘own the weather’ in 2025, without doing research and experiments in the here and now – chemtrails are therefore only a part of a much bigger agenda. The bigger agenda is to turn the weather into a weapon of war – and the military are doing what they always have done – they experiment on their own people – YES THEY DO!
God bless, Bruce Telfer.
Notes:
‘Persistent contrails’ presentation to UN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5is16A8pfw
Kristen Meghan, whistleblower: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su5PVOqsPhU
Fox news report: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2x7Cugi7g8
Jet landing with spraying system still on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGYDQ-bI7K8
‘Owning the weather’ research paper: ttp://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
