Signs of the Times #47

Signs of the Times #47

The Conquest of America (USA) – part 10


Originally posted Jan. 21, 2015.


Quotes of the Times:

“In 1960, John Kennedy went from Washington down to Texas to assure Protestant preachers that he would not obey the pope. In 2001 George Bush came from Texas up to Washington to assure a group of Catholic bishops that he would.”  Professor Robert George, The Washington Post, April 16, 2001.


“The best way to honor Pope John Paul II, truly one of the great men, is to take his teaching seriously; is to listen to his words and put his words and teachings into action here in America. This is a challenge we must accept.  But you know something about our country? With the right focus and the right leadership, it’s a challenge this nation will accept…”  President George W. Bush, March 22, 2001.

“Catholics are visibly more active in the Obama administration than in any other Democratic administration in recent memory.”  National Catholic Reporter (Catholic magazine), June 22, 2009.

“You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked… you’re plucked so-to-speak, and you are assigned success…  You are assigned a certain role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the hand pickers can put you.”  Radio Talk show Host Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 7th, 1995.

The Catholic conquest of America is very evident in the ‘plucking’ and ‘assigning’ of Catholic’s into the highest echelons of the US Government.  Typically, the US President will not be a Catholic, but he will be surrounded by Catholics – most of his top advisors and officials will be Catholic.  For example, not only did President Ronald Reagan, renew diplomatic ties with the Vatican, but most of his political appointees were also Catholic.  After normalizing relations with the Vatican, Reagan and the Pope quickly got to work.  According to Time magazine, they formed a secret alliance.  Working secretly together, they brought down the Soviet Union in 1991.  Time Magazine featured Reagan and the Pope on the cover of their Feb. 22, 1992 issue.  The title of this issue was: ‘The Holy Alliance’ – the subtitle was: ‘How Reagan and the Pope conspired to assist Poland’s Solidarity movement and hasten the demise of Communism.’  In the article Time exposed the Catholic influence surrounding Reagan: “The key administration players were all devout Roman Catholics – CIA chief William Casey, Allen, Clark, Haig, Walters and William Wilson Reagan’s first ambassador to the Vatican.” p.9.

Since the time of Reagan it is not difficult to look behind the curtain and see the influence of the Catholic Church and the Jesuits.  Bill Clinton started his education under Catholic influence at St. John’s Catholic Elementary School (Hot Springs, Arkansas) and finished it at the Jesuit Georgetown University.  With additional ‘polishing’ at Oxford University, England, as a Rhodes Scholar (more Jesuit influence).  Madeleine Albright, Clinton’s Secretary of State, was probably the most prominent Catholic in the administration.  (Later becoming US Ambassador to the UN. She is on record stating that the sanctions imposed in Iraq – after the first Gulf War which resulted in the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children “was worth it”).  Albright currently serves as a professor of International Relations at the Jesuit Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service.  Clinton’s chief of staff, Leon E. Panetta, (and later CIA director, and Secretary of Defence in the Obama administration), is also Catholic.

Vice President, Dick Cheney, was often considered the power behind the throne during the presidency of George W. Bush – but there was also a person behind Dick Cheney’s throne.  The magazine, US New and World Report, in an article entitled ‘Cheney’s Guy’ described this ‘plucked’ and ‘assigned’ string puller as: “He’s barely known outside Washington’s corridors of power, but David Addington is the most powerful man you’ve never heard of.”  The article actually calls him ‘the invisible hand’ – typically, this out of sight, string puller, is a Catholic.  Addington’s NNDB profile ( – a website that tracks all newsworthy individuals), has this to say about him:

Addington is a hard core neoconservative.  He helped author the policy papers justifying torture, and the papers sidelining the Geneva Conventions, which led to the Abu Ghraib disaster.  He promotes the argument that suspects may be held without access to any judicial review whatsoever, an unconstitutional theory by any degree.  His view as to the executive branch is that it should be supremely powerful, and he pores over budget appropriations for any riders that might put even subtle checks on executive power.

In other words, David Addington, despises the US Constitution, he wants to destroy American freedoms, he wants to turn the presidency into a dictatorship and he wants to torture those who oppose his Catholic agenda – all this from a man of immense influence, behind the curtain, in the Bush administration.

Immediately after 9/11, the freedom sapping Patriot Act was rushed through the US Congress.  The Patriot Act weakens the rights of Americans, and the authority of the constitution, and strengthens the powers of the executive branch (the office of the president) – this is precisely what David Addington (and many others) are working for.  The Patriot Act was written by Viet D. Dinh.  Mr. Dinh is a Vietnamese, Roman Catholic lawyer, working as a professor of law at the Jesuit Georgetown University (in other words, the Jesuits wrote the Patriot Act – crippling the US Constitution).

The current Obama administration is no different.  Obama was a man who came from nowhere to become the President of the United States.  Obama’s obscure origins and lack of political achievement (meaning he had little credibility), bears all the hall-marks of one who was ‘plucked and ‘assigned.’  In order to reach the heady heights of the American political system, one needs some ‘heavy hitters’ on the team.  What we do know about Obama, is that, he got his start on the bottom rungs of the political ladder, with the assistance of two Jesuit mentors; Greg Galluzzo and Mike Kruglik.   Obama’s first employer was The Developing Communities Project, in Chicago.  The Development Communities Project was part of the Gamaliel Foundation network of organizations and Jesuit Mike Kruglik was Gamaliel’s founder, and Jesuit Greg Galluzzo was Gamaliel’s executive director.  We are told that: “the Gamaliel Foundation works in the community organizing tradition of Alinsky.” Wikipedia, art. Gamaliel Foundation.  And both Galluzzo and Kruglik schooled Obama in Alinsky tactics.  And who was Saul Alinsky?  Alinsky wrote the most influential book for social engineering from the leftist/Marxist/Communist perspective, titled ‘Rules for Radicals’ – his motto was: ‘The most effective means are whatever will achieve the desired results’ – which is the same as the Jesuit motto: ‘The end justifies the means’ – it is this Jesuit philosophy that Obama imbibed during his time in Chicago, it is this Jesuit philosophy and tactics that he used to get elected (Jesuit Kruglik assisted with his election campaign), and it is this Jesuit philosophy that he is using to socially engineer the United States of America today.

Obama has much assistance from Catholic/Jesuit/Alinsky inspired people who dominate his administration, including; vice-President, Joe Biden (educated at Archmere Academy, private Catholic school); Joseph Clapper (known as Obama’s ‘Intelligence Czar’), director of National Intelligence (educated at St. Mary’s University, Catholic school); Robert Cardillo, Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Intelligence Integration (educated at Jesuit Georgetown University); and Tom Donilon, Deputy National Security Advisor (educated at The Catholic University of America).  In fact the National Catholic Reporter (June 22, 2009), tells us that: “one-third of his Cabinet is Catholic.”

Catholic dominance/influence in the other major institutions of US governance, include a majority of Catholics on the US Supreme Court (six Catholic judges, three Jewish judges, no Protestant judges).  Historically, the court used to be a bastion of Protestant power.  In the US Congress, Catholics make up 28% of the members – proportionately higher than the percentage of Catholics in the US population, which is 24%.  The Catholic 28% makes them the largest representative body of any one individual church in Congress.

To be continued…

God bless, Bruce Telfer.

Extra Note:

The growth of Catholic/Jesuit power over political leaders is not restricted to the United States.  For example, in Indonesia (a Muslim nation) there was a very influential Dutch Jesuit, Joop Beek, in the years 1965-1975 (Indonesia used to be a Dutch colony), working at the highest levels of the Indonesian Government.  Beek was at General Suharto’s side when he seized power, from democratically elected President Sukarno, in a military coup (resulting in the deaths of 500,000 Indonesians).  In the new right-wing government Beek became the dictator’s chief advisor.  When a Dutch TV crew made a documentary about Indonesia they interviewed Beek.  The TV interviewer (Aad van den Heuvel, working for the KRO Brandpunt news programme), asked Beek what the contents of an important up and coming speech by Suharto would be.  Beek replied, “I don’t know, I’m still writing it.”

Join Our Newsletter Community
Subscribe to get regular notifications on posts and feature updates.


Leave a Reply